Support This Blog, Get Great Premium Adspace Today

blogads-blog-button5

Support Political Byline by patronizing these fine companies!

Really Simple Syndication stuff!

Like what you read here? Then Hit the Friggin’ TipJar!

Support Political Byline by patronizing these fine companies!

Barnes and Noble Valentine's Day Collection - Save up to 45% on gifts for your sweetheart Animated Truck 4WP JewelElegance 120x60 Banner MPI Coin Brand Banner

Support Political Byline by patronizing these fine companies!

Support Political Byline by buying from Amazon!

Please, Check out the Political Byline Bookstore!

Check out my Blog Store!

Please, support my sponsors

The servers that power this blog! Please support them!

120x60-green

Support Political Byline by patronizing these fine companies!

What’s happening in the Blogosphere!

Cool Cartoons!

Buttons and Such!

Powered by FeedBurner



http://www.wikio.com

 member of the NObama Network!

Headlines from The Jerusalem Post

libertarian bloggers (That I can stand to read)

free counters

web page stats
August 22, 2008, 5:54 pm

Lying asshole “Shock Troops” Author back in the news

Unbelievable.

Via Pajamas Media:

Quote:

It seemed we’d heard the last of Scott Thomas Beauchamp and Elspeth Reeve in late January, after I posted copies of the sworn statements gathered during the “Shock Troops” investigation on Confederate Yankee. The documents included Beauchamp’s own sworn statements — his first, where he did not see any of the minor atrocities written about in “Shock Troops,” and a backdated one where he finally admits he was the author. The documents also included the sworn statements from 22 other soldiers saying that the minor atrocities written about in “Shock Troops” were events that they did not witness.

Even the editor of the New Republic, Franklin Foer, announced a month previously in December that he could not stand behind Beauchamp’s stories. But just when we though it was all behind us, Beauchamp is back, (with his former fact checker wife still supporting him), courtesy of Spencer Ackerman in Radar magazine.

In “Notes on a Scandal,” Ackerman interviews Scott Beauchamp and Elspeth Reeve — and no one else — and shockingly comes to the conclusion that the magazine that fired Ackerman for his anti-war views was wrong to pull its support for a series of articles (”Shock Troops” was just one of three Beauchamp stories) that reinforced those views.

How did Ackerman conduct this investigation? He hung out with Beauchamp and Reeve at a bar and later communicated with them via email. What he did not do is present any evidence to support the contention that Beauchamp’s claims are true, or that Franklin Foer was wrong to pull support for stories that still lack on-the-record evidence of any kind.

I have to admit it, he does have balls. But he is a damn liar. He’s now trying to cash in on the fame. Lying ass liberal prick.

I remember when this story come out and then it came out that it was all lies. That was one the moments when I really began to rethink my political position. I mean, if liberals are willing outright lie to make a political point, something is just wrong. Which is why I consider myself now a Moderate Conservative, not a “Republican”, not by a long shot. But I’ll be damned if I’ll ever vote Democrat again.

Others:
BLACKFIVE and AMERICAN DIGEST

Technorati Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

The Opinions Expressed on this blog are not necessarily those of the advertisers The Opinions Expressed in the comments section of this Blog are not necessarily those of the Blog owner. Please Note: Comments Close after 10 days

Comments are closed.