Support This Blog, Get Great Premium Adspace Today

blogads-blog-button5

Support Political Byline by patronizing these fine companies!

Really Simple Syndication stuff!

Like what you read here? Then Hit the Friggin’ TipJar!

Support Political Byline by patronizing these fine companies!

Barnes and Noble Valentine's Day Collection - Save up to 45% on gifts for your sweetheart Animated Truck 4WP JewelElegance 120x60 Banner MPI Coin Brand Banner

Support Political Byline by patronizing these fine companies!

Support Political Byline by buying from Amazon!

Please, Check out the Political Byline Bookstore!

Check out my Blog Store!

Please, support my sponsors

The servers that power this blog! Please support them!

120x60-green

Support Political Byline by patronizing these fine companies!

What’s happening in the Blogosphere!

Cool Cartoons!

Buttons and Such!

Powered by FeedBurner



http://www.wikio.com

 member of the NObama Network!

Headlines from The Jerusalem Post

libertarian bloggers (That I can stand to read)

free counters

web page stats
October 14, 2008, 11:14 am

This can’t be good…

Stanley Kurtz over at National Review has up a pretty damning piece on Obama and his ties to Wright and extremist Afrocentrists.

The quote:

Given the precedent of his earlier responses on Ayers and Wright, Obama might be inclined to deny personal knowledge of the educational philosophy he was so generously funding. Such a denial would not be convincing. For one thing, we have evidence that in 1995, the same year Obama assumed control of the Chicago Annenberg Challenge, he publicly rejected “the unrealistic politics of integrationist assimilation,” a stance that clearly resonates with both Wright and Carruthers. (See “No Liberation.”)

And as noted, Wright had invited Carruthers, Hilliard, and like-minded thinkers to address his Trinity congregants. Wright likes to tick off his connections to these prominent Afrocentrists in sermons, and Obama would surely have heard of them. Reading over SSAVC’s Annenberg proposals, Obama could hardly be ignorant of what they were about. And if by some chance Obama overlooked Hilliard’s or Carruthers’s names, SSAVC’s proposals are filled with references to “rites of passage” and “Ptahhotep,” dead giveaways for the anti-American and separatist ideological concoction favored by SSAVC.

We know that Obama did read the proposals. Annenberg documents show him commenting on proposal quality. And especially after 1995, when concerns over self-dealing and conflicts of interest forced the Ayers-headed “Collaborative” to distance itself from monetary issues, all funding decisions fell to Obama and the board. Significantly, there was dissent within the board. One business leader and experienced grant-smith characterized the quality of most Annenberg proposals as “awful.” (See “The Chicago Annenberg Challenge: The First Three Years,” p. 19.) Yet Obama and his very small and divided board kept the money flowing to ideologically extremist groups like the South Shore African Village Collaborative, instead of organizations focused on traditional educational achievement.

This is pretty disturbing for a man who wants to be President. I just do not buy Obama’s line of, “I didn’t hear Wright’s sermons”. This goes much farther and might give Obama more trouble.

Others: The Corner, Hot Air, Confederate Yankee and YID With LID

Technorati Tags: , , , , , , , , , ,

The Opinions Expressed on this blog are not necessarily those of the advertisers The Opinions Expressed in the comments section of this Blog are not necessarily those of the Blog owner. Please Note: Comments Close after 10 days

1 comment to This can’t be good…