Support This Blog, Get Great Premium Adspace Today

blogads-blog-button5

Support Political Byline by patronizing these fine companies!

Really Simple Syndication stuff!

Like what you read here? Then Hit the Friggin’ TipJar!

Support Political Byline by patronizing these fine companies!

Barnes and Noble Valentine's Day Collection - Save up to 45% on gifts for your sweetheart Animated Truck 4WP JewelElegance 120x60 Banner MPI Coin Brand Banner

Support Political Byline by patronizing these fine companies!

Support Political Byline by buying from Amazon!

Please, Check out the Political Byline Bookstore!

Check out my Blog Store!

Please, support my sponsors

The servers that power this blog! Please support them!

120x60-green

Support Political Byline by patronizing these fine companies!

What’s happening in the Blogosphere!

Cool Cartoons!

Buttons and Such!

Powered by FeedBurner



http://www.wikio.com

 member of the NObama Network!

Headlines from The Jerusalem Post

libertarian bloggers (That I can stand to read)

free counters

web page stats
December 31, 2008, 9:18 am

Harpy White Bitch Sues New York Times

Wonderful. As if the gray lady did not have enough trouble. Some Ann Coulter wanna-be is filing a lawsuit for getting smeared by the New York Times:

Washington lobbyist Vicki L. Iseman has filed a $27 million defamation lawsuit against The New York Times for a February article about Iseman and her relationship with Sen. John McCain.

The suit, filed in U.S. District Court in Richmond on Tuesday, alleges the article falsely communicated that Iseman and McCain had an illicit “romantic” relationship in 1999 when he was chair of the Senate Commerce Committee and she was a lobbyist representing clients before Congress.

The suit also names the executive editor of the Times, its Washington bureau chief and four reporters who wrote the story as defendants.

William Keller, the paper’s executive editor, did not respond to an e-mail requesting comment on the suit.

The New York Times has responded:

“We fully stand behind the article.  We continue to believe it to be true and accurate, and that we will prevail. As we said at the time, it was an important piece that raised questions about a presidential contender and the perception that he had been engaged in conflicts of interest.”

Roger L. Simon says this could spell trouble:

I have no direct knowledge of the case or of Iseman, but if I were the Times, I would be afraid. I would be very afraid. They have a lot more to lose than the 27 million bucks in the suit. Their reputation is already tarnished and their bottom line diminishing. If Iseman can prove her case to the public’s satisfaction, it will constitute yet more bruising and a serious humiliation for the sometime “newspaper of record”.  Those who have been accusing them of being nothing more than a scandal sheet – and a biased one at that, unlike the National Enquirer –  will be vindicated.  Indeed, if Ms. Iseman wins her case, the Times’ editors and publisher will be revealed to have been simultaneously boneheaded and despicable – an ugly combination indeed.

I just wonder, if she happens to win and takes over ownership of the paper, whom will she make the Editor? Ann Coulter? :roll:

Way I see it, if she wasn’t bobbing the knob. Then honestly, what is the problem?

Can you say, cashing in? I knew you could! :D

(Via Memeornadum)

The Opinions Expressed on this blog are not necessarily those of the advertisers The Opinions Expressed in the comments section of this Blog are not necessarily those of the Blog owner. Please Note: Comments Close after 10 days

Comments are closed.