Number Two, I think Coulter is a great writer; but she comes off looking like the court jester instead of some serious political commentator.

Number Three, she also is quite the Neo-Con who still pushes the long discredited Bush line.

Number Four, One of Ann’s most fatal flaws is that, when challenged, she gets a horrible attitude and jumps to the defensive, especially if someone begins to insult her.

This is why I don’t read her books, I want intelligent arguments, not stupidity and screed.

Just my thoughts,

-Pat

One of the great things about listening to your opponent is to listen and listen good! Maybe, just maybe they make a valid point. Coulter is just that type of opponent. Her outside veneer rattles the knee-jerk liberals who practice the consistent inability, when thrown into a good argument, to tread water at the surface and instead sink right to the bottom without holding their breath. In other words… this group finds it impossible to contain their silliness from the beginning and go right into attack mode without examining the arguments Coulter posits.

It is great that Coulter goes on the view. This affords one of the rare… very rare opportunities those harpies will ever have to be exposed to common sense logic backed by evidence. Of course, being knee-jerk liberals and always blathering on, they never miss an opportunity to miss an opportunity to become informed.

Yeah it’s painful… but the liberal mind crammed with cliches and phoney baloney moral outrage has that effect. Never sitting quiet enough to listen ensures that they will learn nothing in the process.