Support This Blog, Get Great Premium Adspace Today

blogads-blog-button5

Support Political Byline by patronizing these fine companies!

Really Simple Syndication stuff!

Like what you read here? Then Hit the Friggin’ TipJar!

Support Political Byline by patronizing these fine companies!

Barnes and Noble Valentine's Day Collection - Save up to 45% on gifts for your sweetheart Animated Truck 4WP JewelElegance 120x60 Banner MPI Coin Brand Banner

Support Political Byline by patronizing these fine companies!

Support Political Byline by buying from Amazon!

Please, Check out the Political Byline Bookstore!

Check out my Blog Store!

Please, support my sponsors

The servers that power this blog! Please support them!

120x60-green

Support Political Byline by patronizing these fine companies!

What’s happening in the Blogosphere!

Cool Cartoons!

Buttons and Such!

Powered by FeedBurner



http://www.wikio.com

 member of the NObama Network!

Headlines from The Jerusalem Post

libertarian bloggers (That I can stand to read)

free counters

web page stats
February 19, 2009, 2:18 pm

Rat in the mouse house?

Well, something like that:

You’ve heard a lot about the astonishing spending in the $787 billion economic stimulus bill, signed into law this week by President Barack Obama. But you probably haven’t heard about a provision in the bill that threatens to politicize the way allegations of fraud and corruption are investigated — or not investigated — throughout the federal government.

Photographers take pictures of the economic stimulus bill after President Barack Obama signed the document during a ceremony at the Denver Museum of Nature and Science in Denver, Tuesday, Feb. 17, 2009. (AP Photo/Gerald Herbert)

The provision, which attracted virtually no attention in the debate over the 1,073-page stimulus bill, creates something called the Recovery Accountability and Transparency Board — the RAT Board, as it’s known by the few insiders who are aware of it. The board would oversee the in-house watchdogs, known as inspectors general, whose job is to independently investigate allegations of wrongdoing at various federal agencies, without fear of interference by political appointees or the White House.

In the name of accountability and transparency, Congress has given the RAT Board the authority to ask “that an inspector general conduct or refrain from conducting an audit or investigation.” If the inspector general doesn’t want to follow the wishes of the RAT Board, he’ll have to write a report explaining his decision to the board, as well as to the head of his agency (from whom he is supposedly independent) and to Congress. In the end, a determined inspector general can probably get his way, but only after jumping through bureaucratic hoops that will inevitably make him hesitate to go forward.

When Iowa Republican Sen. Charles Grassley, a longtime champion of inspectors general, read the words “conduct or refrain from conducting,” alarm bells went off. The language means that the board — whose chairman will be appointed by the president — can reach deep inside a federal agency and tell an inspector general to lay off some particularly sensitive subject. Or, conversely, it can tell the inspector general to go after a tempting political target.

via The RAT hiding deep inside the stimulus bill – www.dcexaminer.com.

Sounds like Communism to me. One must report the fuhrer before he can exercise his authority. Hope and change? I hardly think so. More like control and tyranny.

Others: JustOneMinute, Riehl World View, Hot Airprotein wisdom, Wizbang, Cold Fury and Sister Toldjah


The Opinions Expressed on this blog are not necessarily those of the advertisers The Opinions Expressed in the comments section of this Blog are not necessarily those of the Blog owner. Please Note: Comments Close after 10 days

1 comment to Rat in the mouse house?

  • bernard steffen

    Exactly what did the authors of this provision have in mind?
    If Barry Soetero aka Barak H Obama gets by all of the lawsuits, he will be impervious to any internal investigations in to “secrets”.
    I can only suppose that this is part of the “transparency” Barry has been espousing (ugh).