<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Report Says that Gitmo Meets Geneva Convention Standards</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.politicalbyline.com/2009/02/21/report-says-that-gitmo-meets-geneva-convention-standards/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.politicalbyline.com/2009/02/21/report-says-that-gitmo-meets-geneva-convention-standards/</link>
	<description>Right of Center, Not Stuck on Stupid</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 06:43:06 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bob</title>
		<link>http://www.politicalbyline.com/2009/02/21/report-says-that-gitmo-meets-geneva-convention-standards/comment-page-1/#comment-3855</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 05:27:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.politicalbyline.com/2009/02/21/report-says-that-gitmo-meets-geneva-convention-standards/#comment-3855</guid>
		<description>Um, it&#039;s this kind of cowing to Political Correctness that scares off Conservatives from telling the Truth about [CENSORED]s.

We should not bow to the liberal/pro-Negro narrative that tries to freeze any speech that does not fit the lib-Marxist agenda.

I didn&#039;t plan on commenting much more anyway, but I just think we should not pull our punches when it comes to race; you don&#039;t have to be a &quot;Nazi&quot; or &quot;Skinhead&quot; to call a spade a spade.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--INFOLINKS_ON-->Um, it&#8217;s this kind of cowing to Political Correctness that scares off Conservatives from telling the Truth about [CENSORED]s.</p>
<p>We should not bow to the liberal/pro-Negro narrative that tries to freeze any speech that does not fit the lib-Marxist agenda.</p>
<p>I didn&#8217;t plan on commenting much more anyway, but I just think we should not pull our punches when it comes to race; you don&#8217;t have to be a &#8220;Nazi&#8221; or &#8220;Skinhead&#8221; to call a spade a spade.<!--INFOLINKS_OFF--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paleo Pat</title>
		<link>http://www.politicalbyline.com/2009/02/21/report-says-that-gitmo-meets-geneva-convention-standards/comment-page-1/#comment-3853</link>
		<dc:creator>Paleo Pat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 04:34:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.politicalbyline.com/2009/02/21/report-says-that-gitmo-meets-geneva-convention-standards/#comment-3853</guid>
		<description>Suit yourself. But I respectfully ask that you refrain from using derogatory racial slurs here. Negros is acceptable, as it refers to a race and it is the historical term of the Black race; &lt;i&gt;albeit a bit political incorrect&lt;/i&gt; one. Not that it matters, because I believe the whole idea of &quot;Political Correctness&quot; is a bit silly, considering what some blacks call people of the Anglo Saxon race in private. 

However, the use of the word, &lt;b&gt;&lt;i&gt;&lt;u&gt;NIGGER&lt;/u&gt;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/b&gt; is a slanderous term invented by white people in the south. It&#039;s sole use is to denigrate those of the Black or as it is called now the &quot;African-American&quot; race, and it is not going to be published here; &lt;i&gt;Period&lt;/i&gt;. If that is a problem, this might not be the place for you. This is not, I repeat, &lt;b&gt;&lt;i&gt;&lt;u&gt;NOT&lt;/u&gt;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/b&gt; a Neo-Nazi, Skinhead Blog, nor will it &lt;i&gt;ever&lt;/i&gt; be.   

What this blog is, as a Paleo-Conservative, libertarian-minded, Political Opinion Blog. It also is a place with the race issue is discussed with frank honesty. Not where blacks are slandered, just because they are black. I leave that the likes of David Duke and Stormfront.org. I criticize the politics, not the race. 

There is a line, that I will not cross, if it is crossed, the people responsible for it, will be dealt with. Even if it means banning IP addresses. I hate to do that sort of a thing, But I will, if need be. 

Hope this clears my position up. 

-Paleo Pat
Owner</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--INFOLINKS_ON-->Suit yourself. But I respectfully ask that you refrain from using derogatory racial slurs here. Negros is acceptable, as it refers to a race and it is the historical term of the Black race; <i>albeit a bit political incorrect</i> one. Not that it matters, because I believe the whole idea of &#8220;Political Correctness&#8221; is a bit silly, considering what some blacks call people of the Anglo Saxon race in private. </p>
<p>However, the use of the word, <b><i><u>NIGGER</u></i></b> is a slanderous term invented by white people in the south. It&#8217;s sole use is to denigrate those of the Black or as it is called now the &#8220;African-American&#8221; race, and it is not going to be published here; <i>Period</i>. If that is a problem, this might not be the place for you. This is not, I repeat, <b><i><u>NOT</u></i></b> a Neo-Nazi, Skinhead Blog, nor will it <i>ever</i> be.   </p>
<p>What this blog is, as a Paleo-Conservative, libertarian-minded, Political Opinion Blog. It also is a place with the race issue is discussed with frank honesty. Not where blacks are slandered, just because they are black. I leave that the likes of David Duke and Stormfront.org. I criticize the politics, not the race. </p>
<p>There is a line, that I will not cross, if it is crossed, the people responsible for it, will be dealt with. Even if it means banning IP addresses. I hate to do that sort of a thing, But I will, if need be. </p>
<p>Hope this clears my position up. </p>
<p>-Paleo Pat<br />
Owner<!--INFOLINKS_OFF--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob</title>
		<link>http://www.politicalbyline.com/2009/02/21/report-says-that-gitmo-meets-geneva-convention-standards/comment-page-1/#comment-3852</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 04:16:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.politicalbyline.com/2009/02/21/report-says-that-gitmo-meets-geneva-convention-standards/#comment-3852</guid>
		<description>Well I AM against all Blacks, and I don&#039;t care how racist that sounds. Give libs an inch and they&#039;ll take a mile and call you every name in the book.

Well I&#039;m sick of it, white men need to take this country back!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--INFOLINKS_ON-->Well I AM against all Blacks, and I don&#8217;t care how racist that sounds. Give libs an inch and they&#8217;ll take a mile and call you every name in the book.</p>
<p>Well I&#8217;m sick of it, white men need to take this country back!<!--INFOLINKS_OFF--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paleo Pat</title>
		<link>http://www.politicalbyline.com/2009/02/21/report-says-that-gitmo-meets-geneva-convention-standards/comment-page-1/#comment-3835</link>
		<dc:creator>Paleo Pat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Feb 2009 22:11:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.politicalbyline.com/2009/02/21/report-says-that-gitmo-meets-geneva-convention-standards/#comment-3835</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Sorry, I’ll try again.

Negro-lovers are ruining HotAir.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Well now. I would not necessarily call HotAir&#039;s bunch &quot;Negro Lovers.&quot; What they really are, is what I and some other Paleo-Conservatives like to call them, The &quot;Go along, to get along&quot; crowd.   

What I mean is, that the Neo-Cons love to denounce the Hip Hop culture, but they won&#039;t assign it to any particular race. They to this to appease the left and try to disarm any accusations of Racism. The problem is, that the destructive Hip Hop Culture &lt;b&gt;&lt;u&gt;was&lt;/u&gt;&lt;/b&gt; started in the black race, and not in the White race. There&#039;s nothing racist about making that observation. Because the Republican Party wants to have such a broad tent, (the election of Michael Steele being a perfect example of that..) they tend to avoid making generalizations about the Black race. Again to appease the opposition. 

So, again, I can understand your feelings, but there&#039;s just more to it, than just them being, &quot;Negro Lovers.&quot; 

Let me also make something clear here. My battle is not against Blacks, at all. What my battle is against, is the attacks against free speech, directed towards Conservatives, especially White or Anglo-Saxon Conservative Americans by the Liberal Black Community. It must be noted that &lt;u&gt;&lt;b&gt;NOT ALL BLACKS ARE LIBERALS!&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/u&gt; I do post videos here of a young black Conservative named Zo, you can find it by searching around here. and you can see links to black Conservative Blogs. 

I just wanted to clear that up, &lt;b&gt;&lt;u&gt;I am not a Neo-Nazi Skin head or a White Nationalist, at all, never have been, never will be.&lt;/u&gt;&lt;/b&gt; I&#039;m just for protecting freedom of speech and Conservative Principles, that this Nation was founded upon. 

My battle is not a racial one, but a political one. :D 

Thanks again for the comments. 

-Pat</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--INFOLINKS_ON--><br />
<blockquote>Sorry, I’ll try again.</p>
<p>Negro-lovers are ruining HotAir.</p></blockquote>
<p>Well now. I would not necessarily call HotAir&#8217;s bunch &#8220;Negro Lovers.&#8221; What they really are, is what I and some other Paleo-Conservatives like to call them, The &#8220;Go along, to get along&#8221; crowd.   </p>
<p>What I mean is, that the Neo-Cons love to denounce the Hip Hop culture, but they won&#8217;t assign it to any particular race. They to this to appease the left and try to disarm any accusations of Racism. The problem is, that the destructive Hip Hop Culture <b><u>was</u></b> started in the black race, and not in the White race. There&#8217;s nothing racist about making that observation. Because the Republican Party wants to have such a broad tent, (the election of Michael Steele being a perfect example of that..) they tend to avoid making generalizations about the Black race. Again to appease the opposition. </p>
<p>So, again, I can understand your feelings, but there&#8217;s just more to it, than just them being, &#8220;Negro Lovers.&#8221; </p>
<p>Let me also make something clear here. My battle is not against Blacks, at all. What my battle is against, is the attacks against free speech, directed towards Conservatives, especially White or Anglo-Saxon Conservative Americans by the Liberal Black Community. It must be noted that <u><b>NOT ALL BLACKS ARE LIBERALS!</b></u> I do post videos here of a young black Conservative named Zo, you can find it by searching around here. and you can see links to black Conservative Blogs. </p>
<p>I just wanted to clear that up, <b><u>I am not a Neo-Nazi Skin head or a White Nationalist, at all, never have been, never will be.</u></b> I&#8217;m just for protecting freedom of speech and Conservative Principles, that this Nation was founded upon. </p>
<p>My battle is not a racial one, but a political one. <img src='http://www.politicalbyline.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' />  </p>
<p>Thanks again for the comments. </p>
<p>-Pat<!--INFOLINKS_OFF--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob</title>
		<link>http://www.politicalbyline.com/2009/02/21/report-says-that-gitmo-meets-geneva-convention-standards/comment-page-1/#comment-3834</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Feb 2009 21:49:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.politicalbyline.com/2009/02/21/report-says-that-gitmo-meets-geneva-convention-standards/#comment-3834</guid>
		<description>Sorry, I&#039;ll try again.

Negro-lovers are ruining HotAir.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--INFOLINKS_ON-->Sorry, I&#8217;ll try again.</p>
<p>Negro-lovers are ruining HotAir.<!--INFOLINKS_OFF--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob</title>
		<link>http://www.politicalbyline.com/2009/02/21/report-says-that-gitmo-meets-geneva-convention-standards/comment-page-1/#comment-3833</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Feb 2009 21:18:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.politicalbyline.com/2009/02/21/report-says-that-gitmo-meets-geneva-convention-standards/#comment-3833</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;(snipped)&lt;/em&gt; are ruining HotAir.

&lt;u&gt;&lt;em&gt;Bob... I can appreciate your feelings buddy, okay? But using that word to express how you feel, just lowers the level of intelligence of the discussion. So, again, while I can understand your feelings, let&#039;s not act like Neo-Nazi skinheads. We can fight the battle against the subject at hand here, without stooping to the level of the Liberal Democrats and other such idiots. Thanks for understanding... -Pat&lt;/em&gt; &lt;/u&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--INFOLINKS_ON--><em>(snipped)</em> are ruining HotAir.</p>
<p><u><em>Bob&#8230; I can appreciate your feelings buddy, okay? But using that word to express how you feel, just lowers the level of intelligence of the discussion. So, again, while I can understand your feelings, let&#8217;s not act like Neo-Nazi skinheads. We can fight the battle against the subject at hand here, without stooping to the level of the Liberal Democrats and other such idiots. Thanks for understanding&#8230; -Pat</em> </u><!--INFOLINKS_OFF--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: It is just so damned ironic &#124; Political Byline</title>
		<link>http://www.politicalbyline.com/2009/02/21/report-says-that-gitmo-meets-geneva-convention-standards/comment-page-1/#comment-3812</link>
		<dc:creator>It is just so damned ironic &#124; Political Byline</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Feb 2009 22:26:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.politicalbyline.com/2009/02/21/report-says-that-gitmo-meets-geneva-convention-standards/#comment-3812</guid>
		<description>[...] There are, as always two sides to every story. &#160;&#160; Report Says that Gitmo Meets Geneva Convention Standards [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--INFOLINKS_ON-->[...] There are, as always two sides to every story. &nbsp;&nbsp; Report Says that Gitmo Meets Geneva Convention Standards [...]<!--INFOLINKS_OFF--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
