Don’t believe the hype on the Coup in Honduras

That is what Octavio Sánchez is saying, and he should know; he’s there:

Tegucigalpa, Honduras – Sometimes, the whole world prefers a lie to the truth. The White House, the United Nations, the Organization of American States, and much of the media have condemned the ouster of Honduran President Manuel Zelaya this past weekend as a coup d’état.

That is nonsense.

In fact, what happened here is nothing short of the triumph of the rule of law.

[….]

Under our Constitution, what happened in Honduras this past Sunday? Soldiers arrested and sent out of the country a Honduran citizen who, the day before, through his own actions had stripped himself of the presidency.

These are the facts: On June 26, President Zelaya issued a decree ordering all government employees to take part in the “Public Opinion Poll to convene a National Constitutional Assembly.” In doing so, Zelaya triggered a constitutional provision that automatically removed him from office.

Constitutional assemblies are convened to write new constitutions. When Zelaya published that decree to initiate an “opinion poll” about the possibility of convening a national assembly, he contravened the unchangeable articles of the Constitution that deal with the prohibition of reelecting a president and of extending his term. His actions showed intent.

Our Constitution takes such intent seriously. According to Article 239: “No citizen who has already served as head of the Executive Branch can be President or Vice-President. Whoever violates this law or proposes its reform [emphasis added], as well as those that support such violation directly or indirectly, will immediately cease in their functions and will be unable to hold any public office for a period of 10 years.”

Notice that the article speaks about intent and that it also says “immediately” – as in “instant,” as in “no trial required,” as in “no impeachment needed.”

Continuismo – the tendency of heads of state to extend their rule indefinitely – has been the lifeblood of Latin America’s authoritarian tradition. The Constitution’s provision of instant sanction might sound draconian, but every Latin American democrat knows how much of a threat to our fragile democracies continuismo presents. In Latin America, chiefs of state have often been above the law. The instant sanction of the supreme law has successfully prevented the possibility of a new Honduran continuismo.

The Supreme Court and the attorney general ordered Zelaya’s arrest for disobeying several court orders compelling him to obey the Constitution. He was detained and taken to Costa Rica. Why? Congress needed time to convene and remove him from office. With him inside the country that would have been impossible. This decision was taken by the 123 (of the 128) members of Congress present that day.

Don’t believe the coup myth. The Honduran military acted entirely within the bounds of the Constitution. The military gained nothing but the respect of the nation by its actions.

via A ‘coup’ in Honduras? Nonsense. | csmonitor.com.

But yet you have idiot douche bag Communist Liberals, like Hillary Clinton, Like President Obama and the U.N. trying to tell the people in Honduras; that this man was right for doing this. I guess Senator McCarthy was right after all. The Democratic Party has been taken over by the Socialists, who are basically Communist light.  So, to this writer; is no big surprise that President Obama and his right hand lady Hillary Clinton took sides with the Communists.

5 Replies to “Don’t believe the hype on the Coup in Honduras”

  1. So…..there’s crime but no punishment? Those who protect the law violate the law ? It doesn’t make sense, now they tell him don’t comeback or you will be “punished” ???

    1. The Country’s Government told him to choose between Jail and Deportation. He choose Deportation. It is in Honduran Constitution. What they are saying is, if you come back to this country, you will be jailed.

      -Pat

  2. So, I commit a crime and I choose my own punishment? That’s cool !! I am moving to Honduras then !!! I’ve read some parts of the Honduran’s constitution and it doesn’t mention “punishment”. That was a hot potatoe for the arresting guys to handle. Again, it doesn’t make sense if you wanted to put an example once and for all !!! I would have him arrested, spanked and jailed, not grab him in his PJ’s, ask him if he wanted coffee and cream in it, first or second class trip overseas, etc…..To me, they deserve what’s coming for not following with their punishment.
    By the way, the constitution somewhere mentions “using the arms” against a government official as a “no” for holding office or to be punished by the law. The military doing so deserves punishment because again the constitution doesn’t say “only in case it’s done to protect the constitution”. They missed to add that to the explanation.

  3. My question: Are the mainstream media news outlets merely clueless about this, or are they, once again, lying like cowardly propagandist bastards in order to lick the boots of the latest gang of pirates to have highjacked the Ship of State?

    If I were America’s Madame DeFarge, they would be right near the top of my list.

Comments are closed.