Editorial: Withdrawing support of Christine O’Donnell

I do truly regret having to write this sort of a concession article — However, because I am one that likes to side with proper reason, and not with extremism and gender entitlement, I have feel that if I do not write this, I would be committing the ultimate sin to my readers.  That sin being dishonesty.

When Christine O’Donnell burst onto the election scene, I was quite pleased.  The idea if unseating one of the most liberal Republicans in the senate was a great idea. I initially supported Miss. O’Donnell and, like many others,  blasted one of her establishment critics who dared to badmouth her in the media.  I even tried to defend her imperfect record. However, as time went by, I began to see that something was just not quite right about this woman.

So, today I sit here, at this laptop; in sackcloth and ashes, so to speak — and I am writing my concession article of support for the Delaware candidate for Senate for the Republican Party; Miss. Christine O’Donnell.  First, it appears that more damning evidence of strange behavior has become known about Miss. O’Donnell.  Video of her admitting to dabbling in witchcraft has come light. Second, Miss. Christine O’Donnell has committed one of the worse sins of anyone who has any ambition of being involved in any sort of politics. That sin that is of the unpardonable order is to skip out on the Sunday political programs on CBS, and Fox News.

Already other bloggers are making the same conclusion as I; that she was not properly vetted and that now, the Republican Party has a big, big mess on its hands.

To my readers, I offer my most humble apologies.  I usually do not weigh in on regional races or even State races, because it is easy to be caught into the euphoria of a candidate’s race, before you all of the facts about that said person. I readily admit to doing that and for that, my dear readers, I do humbly apologize to all of you.  I foolishly allowed emotions and my bitter hatred of the Neo-Conservative faction of the Republican Party get the best of me.  Because of this, I lost all objectivity in my writing and opinion on this blog.  I cannot promise you that it will not happen again; but I will try like bloody hell for it not to happen again.

To Karl Rove, whom I blasted for being unfair to O’Donnell — you were right sir — you were just doing your job.  It was I, the uninformed oaf, which became, by choice, a “Carnival Barker” for some dishonest, psychotic, amateur political hack, who pawned herself off as the next Sarah Palin and by the power of proxy, the next big thing in the GOP.  Yes, I fell for that little ridiculous lie and now I am looking like quite the chump now.

Honestly, what was I thinking?

The best thing right now that Christine O’Donnell can do is stop her fraudulent joke of a political campaign, refund everyone’s money, and remand herself to the damned dustbin of political folklore, before she damages herself even further than she has now.  Because, as far as this writer is concerned, this feckless woman has done the ultimate bonehead stunt of the century.  Christine O’Donnell has successfully gotten herself nominated by the Republican Party without background checks, without proper vetting and his proceeded to play every damned blogger, woman, and supporter of her campaign for a goddamned fool.  The sick and sad part is; that the Conservative grassroots are so damned desperate for something new, something fresh, something real — that we would allow ourselves to be played like a two-dollar fiddle and that we were, and it disgusts me to my damn core.

I believe I might speak for the good part of the Blogosphere on our side as well as many in the grassroots —- may this sort of idiotic nonsense never, ever, happen again.

That is my opinion and I do welcome yours.

9 Replies to “Editorial: Withdrawing support of Christine O’Donnell”

  1. If the GOP and Tea Party can’t properly vet “revolutionary” candidates like O’Donnell who have extensive records and have worked as political consultants in the GOP in this century then why should anyone let them govern?

    1. Good Point. hence my reason for withdrawing my support. I’m sorry, but, gender entitlement is not a platform to run on; at least not in the Republican Party,

  2. “Christine O’Donnell has successfully gotten herself nominated by the Republican Party without background checks, without proper vetting and his proceeded to play every damned blogger, woman, and supporter of her campaign for a goddamned fool.”

    Sustitute any other “Tea Party” candidate who got out of the primaries for “Christine O’Donnell” and you can start your journey of intellectual salvation.
    Oh, while you’re at it take a conservative friend along for the trip. Do it now and don’t end up like Lady MacBeth.

    1. Oh, while you’re at it take a conservative friend along for the trip. Do it now and don’t end up like Lady MacBeth.

      Thanks for the advice. 🙄

  3. Just found this (small) step in the right direction from O’Donnell:

    Asked whether she favors extending the Bush tax cuts, O’Donnell tells Newsmax: “We absolutely must extend if not make permanent the tax cuts that are going to expire in January.

    “We see Washington approaching this economic problem with more spending. That only serves to increase the debt.

  4. I’m still willing to hold out me hand to Christine. There are some issues she needs to address; Hard call if they need to be addressed outside of Delaware … I don’t think she is lacking for financial support.

    If those against her want to start going after her family, then I do not think that should be addressed by her in a national public stage.

    I’m not going to fall into the ism that candidate don’t need to be vetted. They all need to be vetted!

Comments are closed.